Old notes.


The contemporary human is so anthropocentric that he is completely reluctant to recognize objective laws of nature. This character doesn't depend on the educational level of each individual person with the view point, which can change only from inside rather unconsciously. Even the most idealistic people believe only in facts though in those which are built out of their own perception. Although this is nonsense - the availability of such facts will confirm the system of beliefs but wouldn't change it. So it works that way that the development of the human conscious is fully under the authority of the subconscious, even the most uncontrolled part of it, which contains negative motives.

In his anthropocentricity , the human is also reluctant to cognize (this is the root of the inertness of common scientific paradigms), and just wishes to self-establish in his knowledge as well as in the volume of this knowledge; that is why the concrete aspect of it is so much valued at the expense of damaging the vision of the integral. The integrity is not beneficial for the person; in fact, it always implies the development, the improvement, the principle of content. The self-establishing person values the static character, the form.

The static character appears from the aspiration to convenience outside the development. Regardless of how strongly already formed personality would convince itself that to be different is better than to be non-changing at the moment - in its essence there is a reflex aspiration of the animal nature to the absence of negative irritants. The positive is perceived only to the extent of the familiar, customary, for which the system saves its reserve of energy. (i.e. the reserve of the recognized possibilities).Unlike animals, which have their "new states" already introduced in their "genetic pattern", the rest in majority of it is destructive (the human's invention of the benefits for the animal is initially introduced by force), the state of the human is complicated by the fact that he uses his mind to move on to the new states. But the mind as the ability to b e c o n s c i o u s, which gives complete control of all co-relations of the perceived reality regardless of the rationality or the irrationality of these co-relations (the definition is a bit vague but rather complete) and not as the ability to accumulate the information and to make conclusions out of it. And the accumulation of the information and outlining the reasons and sequences should be already subject to this integrity - the integrity is always a priority and is a few levels higher than concrete facts and their relations.

Nature gave mind to human, so that with learning more about integrity he could move on to more comfortable states (the stability of the systematic structure). The task stays the same - but it is solved in a principally different way not through the material aspect (the evolution has worked elaborately on it, creating different eco-systems with high levels of adaptation) but through the spirit. However, the human fell: he already tasted some reached comfort (although he perceived how to taste it) and wishes to repeat it closing up the reason and sequence circle according to some experienced particular case. Following objective laws, the integrity organizes these particularities, aspirations and achievements- and here almost every person uses his mind as the means of assimilation: through the excess of information and the logic of conclusions regardless of who this person is - a scientist-researcher, a gambler, a manufacturer of the product or a politician who influences public opinion, fashion (in a wide sense of this word). There is no realization of the integrity, the conscious doesn't develop; The nature wasn't given the possibility to fulfill its task, the human separated from it, stood out - not from the forest or savanna; he distanced himself from the objective laws, limited himself from within, although, of course, nobody and nothing gave him this freedom from these laws.

It turns out that these laws start to cause some pressure on the human - and this way the struggle begins. So it works out that the most profound subconscious rules the development of the human and his civilization, something that the personality cuts out, including low aspirations, fear, and conflicts. Each culture has its own low aspirations, something which is prohibited by the authorities (public ethics), and something which is tabooed, which is made fun of or considered painful. Objective laws don't care about human conventions (the human thinks about himself too much, establishing them instead of following the laws of God). In the integrity these energies are integrated, become self-organized and we see how the society comes to wearing out high ideals of a certain era instead of realizing them. Naturally there is a room for new ideals to form, which interrelate with the present ones in the spheres free from the hard "curtains". This provides the consistency of spiritual values. And the materialization of the previous low aspirations at the new stage leads to the purely external and material technical progress and all kinds of using it for the purpose of person's and society's convenience and comfort. Suppressed needs turn out to be the moving force of the civilization (according to Dr. Freid)

Fears rule those spheres of development in which we witness the highest degree of indetermination. Fear which comes out of threat and the unknown pushes the person to struggle for the forms of cognition which are considered "pure" and "unpractical". The energy of fears creates the necessity to see the world in a wider scope and more detail, define the possibilities of the catastrophes and the approach of the "golden age", the presence of the inhabited worlds, the laws of macro world, metaphysical hierarchies. Fears, suppressed for centuries, lead to the deeds of Giordano Bruno, the adventures and conclusions of Darwin, searches of theosophical society and international academic symposiums. However, it would be naive to state, that the true cognition is created by the socially integrated fear - those are the statements which belong to the logical calculations of creative but tightened up individuals.

As for the discrepancies, infringements and violence - all this is brought up from the subconscious through the deeds and social actions, either the eternal hostility between the tribes of the high Landers or disputes over the interests of the oil market (also the movement of the "green"). The positive or negative type of activity is conditioned by the context of the realization of all these energies. The regular person wants to earn a house, have a beautiful wife and three children - but his suppressed conflicts are resonating with those of the millions of similar ones to him, thus attractors and turbulences are being formed and here we see that he gets out of one sphere and moves to the other, he is not happy with the billions, he gets married to a movie star for the sixth time, he has a whole gang behind his back and further on he might stumble across the interest of a different attractor and hopefully this problem could be solved within the framework of personal relationship.

Attractors of "Hitler" and "Stalin" have grinded over the subconscious and lives of tens of millions and can they be reproached in some sort of a metaphysical sin? In the frames of the general integrity the mutual reaction of these forces is necessary for the annihilation of the range of energetic "flaws" which had been accumulated for centuries - but the human still doesn't wish to recognize the Law and bangs against the same wall over and over.

Do the laws of Nature fit in the worldview of a personality? Maybe not, but as the water flows - somewhere it will overflow and somewhere it will wash away. There are major complicated processes happening in the core of the sun and we get to see only a small shining ball. Being in the inner parts of this core it is difficult to perceive such an incredible entity as a small ball, a little star with a specter of radiation and gravitation constant. The gravity pulls us down back to the womb where it is the easiest of all to stay calm and see as less, not thinking about the unfathomably shining ball. Everything we are left with in the nearest sphere, which is obviously more primitive than the observer, who, without a doubt considers himself as a reference point. But the Nature plays its part. It turns out, that we have to come out, look at the other light balls and recognize that it is possible to reach their essence - the non-human one. And there is no center, it just doesn't exist.


One more thing about the originality of the human worldview and absurd character of its philosophical basis... While the idealists keep on trusting only facts - so called materialists, on the contrary in their summaries seek their support in the fully arbitrary ideal thesis. The worldview of the overwhelming majority of people (not counting some philosophers-professionals and religious thinkers) represents an incredible from the logical point of view mix of idealistic and materialistic grounds. Where their materialistic part "rules" the analyses and uses the information which comes from the outer world; the idealistic part serves the purpose of justification of fully performed beliefs and motives of behavior.

Let's consider this phenomenon from the point of view of energetic informative exchange. The situation is simple: the human's internal positions assign the vectors of actions, limiting energetic and external informative reserves, either facts or ideas and change the structure of these directions. The facts of the material nature always are the hard core of support, we could only draw some logical connections, and freedom is limited. The idealistic premises (even if they mimicry the materialism) always demand the orientation to some integrity - they are relative and they express some quality beyond some concrete features.

It turns out that material vectors assign the solid character of the concrete, private order and ideal vectors assign that of the integral.

The tendency towards the separation is obvious: the external orientation of the personality is targeted at the particular and internal one at the integral. And here we reach the culmination-what can be perceived as the integrity inside the person, if the external world (to which other people relate and here we consider the problem proceeding from communication) has a private character?-Of course it is the ego! There can't be anything else integral in the human.

But why not God - in fact God fits just perfectly in the ideal plan from within? Indeed, God is accepted in the ideal plan - but the true God is as one as with himself as with the external world without any separation, everything is within God. Moreover, if the person with some distanced personal orientation calls the feeling of the internal integrity divine - he worships his own ego. Such person justifies any personal external actions in the name of the ideal.

We could even make a test to define the character of the internal and external orientation. It is easy to define the external one by suggesting estimating vividly incredible information as the reality, of course, within the important for a person sphere, the border of lie here is very subtle. The person who accepted such a "miracle" at the orientation to the external ideal integrity (say, God) - is definitely an idealist. To define the internal orientation we need to logically prove from real facts and beliefs of this person the necessity of an obviously unpleasant action. He, who follows this conclusion by developing a materialistic external orientation, is a true materialist. The availability of an idealistic component either from within or from outside will always point at the idealism of the personality.

But having seen the inconsistency of the worldview fundaments of the person, even hiding behind the religious concepts, we once again observe the triumph of anthropocentrism.


A game is a form of reality in which an artificial content is introduced. It is a re-combination of actions, therefore actually it doesn't teach, but only reveals and separates existing characters of a person, refines skills and patterns in using these characters. The aim of any game doesn't reflect the essence of the aim, because it is within itself; within the sense aspect a game is empty, it doesn't develop any content but only outlines the form.

The game excites because it is based on the actions with forms and thus doesn't require any internal structured systemized changes in person. For a child games are necessary to form the growth of the personality. Here there is a teaching side: to reveal the ability and make it manageable. However, it is a big mistake to use games for a so-called "development" - it will lead to closing up of existing qualities and characters of personality, waste of energy on the recombination of a form and as a sequence of it - blocking of the content development of a person.

The correlation of the extraordinary is important and therefore the attraction of the very action and its conditions; sort of a wrapper and a "filling". The range of tales, where magic and the extraordinary are forms while the processes of action are filled with informative and rather real characters - such fairy tales set a very attracting extraordinary form and along this develop the content (the attention follows the form and energy through the plot structure is introduced in the development of the content). Fiction and magic should play the role of a wrapper where a filling is rather natural with real aims and values.

From this point of view, attractive game focuses the attention on the extraordinary content closer to fantasy in action and all principles and essences of the reality stay on the level of a wrapper. Therefore, there is a very important principle: reality comes from the fairy tale and not the opposite way.

There are some examples in literature such as "Kartasar" as a fantasy in reality manages to reveal some extraordinary feelings and relaxation of the conscious; Borges goes for the natural in the artificial. His work "Tlen" manifests general informative laws on the example of fantastic realities, same as Saimak with his "City" and Asimov with "The end of eternity".

The best examples of teaching are the tales of the Russian writer Nosov with his rather unique character Neznaika. Real natural laws and knowledge are introduced in the fairy tale forms there very distinctly - it is well shown in "Neznaika on the moon". The dynamic plot is easily formed through the fairy tale realities and it is very rich with real information providing therefore its fast and effective "digestion". The more fantastic are the external situations, the more efficient is the "digestion". The artificial character of the forms captures attention and allows setting a greater number of adventures, mysteries and riddles.

The adventure - is the development of the plot in some paradox way: the initial aim is one and the result and ways of getting it turn out to be unpredictable. The main difference from the game is that the former sets rules to some certain degree and alternative options of results are being forecast according to logical standards. Although a game as well as adventure is targeted at the process, the form, the latter allows introducing several directions-dimensions in the form, which will require the development of the content. The more new directions appear from the initial aim of the adventure, the greater its informative and developing aspect will be. For the game it would look like a multiple drastic change of rules as the action develops, for instance they started to play chess then switched to checkers and the winner is the judge. It seems absurd from the game's point, however for a complicated multi dimensional adventure it is a highly interesting process and an incredible result with a lot of developing side effects.

Mysteries and riddles, plotted in the beginning, should be subsequently revealed and explained; otherwise the structure of the integral will fall out and might produce a serious effect of vampirism with negative cognitive subsequences. Besides, the more there is correlation of riddles and paradoxes of adventure, the more integrally the multi dimension of the structure is cognized.